WHOM HUMOR
This link takes you to a site that has a few quotes analyzing “whom humor”. Who would have though a pronoun had its own genre of humor?
This link takes you to a site that has a few quotes analyzing “whom humor”. Who would have though a pronoun had its own genre of humor?
Below is a funny chat about WHO v. WHOM from the Office. This very brief article on the conversation analyzes who is right and who is wrong in the conversation. Do you know WITHOUT the article? Either way, it’s worth a glance from any curious grammar student/lover of the Office.
Ryan: You know what I really want? What I really want is for you to know (the computer system) so you can communicate it to your people here, to your clients, to whomever …
Michael: (Snort) OK.
Ryan: What?
Michael: It’s whoever not whomever.
Ryan: It’s whomever.
Michael: No. Whomever is actually never right.
Jim: Well, sometimes it’s right.
Creed: Michael is right. It’s a made-up word used to trick students.
Andy: No. Actually, whomever is the formal version of the word.
Oscar: Obviously, it’s a real word, but I don’t know when to use it correctly.
Michael (to camera): Not a native speaker.
Kevin: I know what’s right. But I’m not going say, because you’re all jerks who didn’t come to see my band last night.
Ryan: Do you really know which one is correct?
Kevin: I don’t know.
Pam: It’s whom when it’s the object of a sentence and who when it’s the subject.
Phyllis: That sounds right.
Michael: Sounds right, but is it right?
Stanley: How did Ryan use it, as an object or a subject?
Ryan: As an object.
Kelly: Ryan used me as an object.
Stanley: Is he right about that … ?
Toby: It was: Ryan wanted Michael, as the subject, to explain the computer system, the object, to whomever, meaning us, the indirect object, which is the correct usage of the word.
Hey AEG students, check out this blog of grammar flash cards! We will learn about a good number of these things. You can hover over the cards provided on the site to see the answers after you’d guessed.
AEG: We won’t touch on the Oxford Comma until chapter 12, but it’s a “hot topic” right now amongst grammarians… and Roger Ebert, apparently. I am not a fan, but I have no immortal justification. I just don’t like it. But I see why people do.
I talked about how the apostrophe is the most hilariously misused mark of punctuation today in my grammar class. Here is one blog of its various misuses.
byEric K. Auld,
from mcsweeneys.net
- - - -
1. A comma splice walks into a bar, it has a drink and then leaves.
2. A dangling modifier walks into a bar. After finishing a drink, the bartender asks it to leave.
3. A question mark walks into a bar?
4. Two quotation marks “walk into” a bar.
5. A gerund and an infinitive walk into a bar, drinking to drink.
6. The bar was walked into by the passive voice.
7. Three intransitive verbs walk into a bar. They sit. They drink. They leave.
Any AEG students writing about teaching and grammar for the final paper might find this article by Patrick Hartwell interesting/useful. This is a link to the JSTOR entry, not actually a link to the article. Please use the Rowan Library’s website to access the full article. I think that even those of you not writing your paper on the teaching of grammar might find it interesting to read in context with this class.
Video on ADVERB CLAUSES— a different approach than how I will teach this. Worth watching, AEG, after you’ve read and done the exercises for chapter 7.
Proper punctuation saves lives. We mean that literally, not figuratively this time.
(Source: futurejournalismproject)
I heard this on NPR this morning— it’s a great skit about people’s names becoming nouns. This may be an interesting topic for a Rowan grammar paper! Definitely watch the song/video.